Limited edition collectibles in collaboration with legends
50% of profits go to the artist.
Of every collectible's profit goes directly to the artist.
Industry standard is 0–20% // We're not the industry
Collect with pride, knowing that…
The Local Legend Labs Promise.
Fifty percent
of the profits are returned to the artist.
The Artist Owns The Work.
Full IP retention. We license the piece for the collectible run. The artist keeps full control over their work. The way it should be.
The Artist Calls The Shots.
The artist has full control over the design process, and how much each collectible costs.
Learn more about the Legends with exclusive interviews
DIY with customizable blanks
Customize your own with a DIY edition
Brands have been stealing from artists for decades.
We didn't invent this problem. We just refused to keep contributing to it. What follows is a partial record of corporations that lifted graffiti work for marketing or merch without credit, license, or payment.
-

Exhibit 01
McDonald's
Source: GrossmanLLP.com // Kate Lucas
A lawsuit alleges that McDonald's used graffiti art from the late artist Dash Snow without permission. The fast-food giant reportedly featured his “SACE” tag in restaurant décor to appeal to a younger audience. This is a reminder of how corporations keep cashing in on graffiti culture while the artists who create it get nothing.
Read the case -

Exhibit 02
Guess
Source: ARTnews // Daniel Cassady
Street artists are once again fighting back, this time against GUESS, which is being sued for allegedly ripping graffiti designs and using them in a clothing line without permission. Big brands love to tap into graffiti culture for cool points but can't be bothered to actually pay the artists who built that culture in the first place.
Read the case -

Exhibit 03
Macy's & Guess
Source: JD Supra // Weintraub Tobin
Graffiti artists are suing Guess for allegedly using their tags on clothing without permission. They say the brand took their street art and turned it into fashion without credit or payment. This case calls out a long-running issue of corporations cashing in on graffiti culture without giving any cut to the people who built it.
Read the case

































